The Bio Report

36

The Bio Report podcast, hosted by award-winning journalist Daniel Levine, focuses on the intersection of biotechnology with business, science, and policy.

Recent Episodes
Episodes loading...
Recent Reviews
  • Snsn snsnsn
    Poor interviewing skills
    It is clear the host is just reading from a script. It’s very distracting the way he pauses in weird places in sentences. And then he essentially ignores what the guest is saying. No follow up questions, no listening, no semblance of conversation, just on to the next canned question. I suggest the host listens to his own interview with Kolluri—he rudely interrupts him several times, and for what reason? Simply to ask his next canned question! It’s so strange. It doesn’t sound like a big deal, but all of this is so distracting that it makes it difficult to focus on the content.
  • DanP9191
    Too loud
    The content is interesting and it’s one of the podcasts I listen to most, but the advertisement and especially the jazz transition music is SO LOUD. When I’m driving and my hands are occupied, I actively cringe at the expectation of having my eardrums blasted when an episode begins or ends. When I’m not driving I try to skip ahead to the ~2 minute mark, because missing a bit of starting context from the actual show is worth preserving my hearing. Please make the audio levels consistent.
  • Juliana621
    Not for physicians
    I’m a physician doing translational research in gene therapy. At least for the medical part the interviews discuss inaccurate information. For example there’s a talk where the interviewee says that in medicine therapy for most or all diseases are only symptom based “...such as diabetes and cancer...” which is absolutely wrong as especially in these diseases therapy starts as early as possible specifically to prevent symptoms. In addition there are some interviews where it seems that the members of the discussion haven’t discussed before hand what points will be touched and sometimes the interviewee “corrects the interviewer” which makes listening confusing. I’m unsubscribing and will search for other translational gene therapy research podcasts.
  • bman90254
    Paid for advertising?
    I can see the relevance for investors to hear these advertisements, however, as a scientist I fail to see the value.
  • DGrande
    Sound quality lacking, but great content
    Can’t understand why this isn’t more popular...it’s incredibly relevant, instructive, and brings in great guests. These are the things I need to know for my team and company. 5 stars.
  • Inrater
    Good content
    I am a longtime investor in Biotech and find the topics and interviews extremely interesting. The sound is not that good but it really doesn’t matter when the content is interesting. I would shorten the intro jingle by 50%. Keep up the good work.
  • Crob9120
    Audio quality is horrible
    Sounds like he just records the speaker phone audio...
  • PhelineCat
    Crushingly disappointing
    I particularly wanted to hear the episode for August 17, 2017- since Reagan there's been excessive focus on shareholders instead of long term company health and employee retention and morale across all industries- but the sound quality was terrible. I tried a few other episodes and I knew I wasn't going to get anything out of this pod because of the poor recording and editing. My suggestions- 1. Spend time learning to do a better job with what you have. There are mentors out there who understand you need knowledge first. 2. Add to your equipment slowly in an as needed basis. Buying the best won't help if you still don't know how to use it. That's the technical stuff but I can't address content. What I hope this podcast does is knock Reagan off his artificial pedestal of broken economic policies- people began suffering in uncounted ways and the stock market solidified that.
Similar Podcasts
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork on this page are property of the podcast owner, and not endorsed by UP.audio.